Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Last week
  2. Trying to respond in order of your statements. Reminder: my responses are from the perspective of an affiliate marketer. Context is critical when discussing SEO. Yeah definitely. I'm just tired of targeting lower volume keywords. I've done it every way imaginable. I can never personally get the content to go viral where the "quality" might matter enough where I actually do earn tons of links. If I target higher competition keywords it might work, but if I don't have enough links to get the content to page 1, it's a broken loop, it just doesn't work. If you're flying solo or it's a small shop with a handful of employees/freelancers, trying to beat out the competition with better quality content doesn't really work. The strategy that works for the "small guys" is usually to farm easy keywords with "decent content" that's informative and helps people. It doesn't need to be mind blowing and if this is done right, since you get traffic and it's helpful, your site will earn links slowly over time. The alternative is grey hat and if done right, does work. The skyscraper technique where you spend 100 hours creating a piece of content and then spend hundreds more marketing it to bloggers can work, I've just had it fail one too many times. I gave up on infographics as well. It's a lot of time invested and the "zero results" outcome just started happening too frequently for me. The only ways to do it and "guarantee results" are to scale it into oblivion or bribe people. I know I'm jaded from some bad outreach campaigns but considering the number of times people have suggested to me that they're willing to link if I pay, I would suggest that is the correct way to go. As far as the gurus, the more time I spend in this space, the more I bump into somebody from an agency that built links for X Y Z guru. I recommend that you completely ignore gurus like Neil Patel and Brain Dean. At least Nathan Gotch is honest and tells people that he buys links. They're not going to run a test like that because then it makes them look foolish and I'm sure they know that with their absurd backlink profiles, they can pick easy keywords and rank gibberish. If the keyword is easy enough you can rank junk content. This isn't very scale-able as panda will hit you eventually. It's looking for a combination of low quality score (ratio of branded searches to unbranded, note: this doesn't matter for low volume sites) and there's likely some kind of objective analysis, things like spelling errors or percentage of content that is unique. If the links are super sketchy as well then it's easier to get penalized. I've never done that exact test but my bet is that it's going to come down to links and whatever click data Google analyzes. Google has no way to evaluate "quality" as it's subjective. I assure you that Google's analysis is "objective." I've done the opposite test plenty of times where I put up an extremely good piece of content on a competitive keyword and since I don't have enough links, I don't rank at all... It's much easier to test that conversely.
  3. Chase26

    DA could not possibly get any worse...

    I enjoy whenever the topic of Moz comes up on /r/seo. Everyone bashes them and they have one lone employee on there that attempts to defend it. He usually gets called out for his lies. I think one time I remember Tim from Ahrefs even jumped in to call him out on his BS.
  4. But here's the thing with that. When the competition is really low, it doesn't even have to be all that decent of a piece of content to rank. Here's what I have never seen any of the "content is king" gurus do. Run a test like this. Find relatively easy to rank keywords. Put up a piece of content that is just okay and rank it. Then a few weeks later do the same thing but write a piece of content that is much higher quality and see if that piece of content outranks the first one. Do this 25-30 times to eliminate some of the variables. Why has nobody done this yet to try to prove that Google really is a good judge of the quality of the content? Or maybe some people have and didn't get the results they were looking for.
  5. Mike Friedman

    OMG. Can Google please stop changing shit?

    I'm certainly much better with it these days, but fallen in love with it? I'm glad you are liking it but I am far away from being in love with it. I wouldn't even have a one-night stand with it yet.
  6. If you target keywords that are easy enough with a decent piece of content, if the rest of the competition for that topic is terrible, once Google gets some decent click data, your content will rank higher and higher over time. Links are not required. I can prove this; I was doing a case study on ranking with out links and it got screwed up because the site got links (the most jacked up problem I've ever had...) Suggesting that it's one thing or another is a "guru tactic." Pick topics that don't have too much competition, create a piece of content that fulfills the searcher's intent, and put the content on a site that has links. This all works together, it doesn't really work any other way. At this very moment in time I'm working exclusively with paid traffic. I temporarily gave up on SEO around November for the most part. I do affiliate marketing so I have the mobility to market whatever I want. Lately the plan has been, find an affiliate who's spending a ton of money on PPC, pay somebody to create a similar landing page (modifying stuff I already have), set the campaign up, if it looks decent, start split testing, if it's horrible, trash can the campaign. If I want 100k clicks today, it wouldn't be financially wise, but I can press a button and get it. I'm really sick of waiting 2-6+ months to see if something works. Over time I'm moving more and more away from SEO. A few years ago my attitude was "well if the traffic is cheap enough, I'll take it." I tried explaining this on reddit and I ended up leaving all the marketing/seo subreddits I subscribe to. To be fair, that's always what has worked in that space, but people always seem to think that things should work a certain way, and from experience, things work any way they work. It does feel like regression though, this is what I was doing back in the Google Adwords heyday when most of the affiliates got slapped. So yeah there's your "SEO guru story." I quit SEO and I'm making more money and honestly I'm having more fun too. Way less time analyzing data in tools, I can get results in 24 hours, no mining 1,000s of emails and begging for links. I haven't needed to do this, but if I screw up bad, I could always build a bunch comment/quora links into a landing page to make back any lost ad spend on a failed campaign. Also, since Google ads merged Double click, Google Ads is also a DSP, so there's ~10 billion impressions a day available through Google Ads between the two networks. So between ads in Google searches, youtube ads, gmail ads, GDN, and DSP, one could probably buy half a billion clicks a day. When at the end of the day, all that matters is a number, just remember that nobody is arguing about what works in r/ppc.
  7. Mike it has definitely gotten better with time here on my end. Fact is, I've fallen in love with the new Adwords layout. Time changes everything.
  8. Earlier
  9. expmrb

    DA could not possibly get any worse...

    Why would they?? Its bad for them.
  10. So I wrote a viral social sharing script, what this does is it replaces the large share buttons on the page based upon the referring URL. So an example: If somebody tweets about it, any visitors that see the page will see a large "Tweet about this" button. Good news: It seems to work. Bad news: It was all Japanese traffic. 🤔 Mixed news: this occurred on a site I gave up on and I'm kind of motivated to work on it again. This is mixed because that means I'm not working on something else where I know it's profitable. I know as fact this is what occurred because the script will pre-populate the tweet with my twitter handle and if they mention me, I can see their tweet via the twitter notification.
  11. Mike Friedman

    DA could not possibly get any worse...

    Yep. They certainly will. And Moz will do nothing to discourage it.
  12. Mike Friedman

    DA could not possibly get any worse...

    The metric might be a little better after the update. What won't be better is the way Moz promotes it. They do little to discourage noobs understanding and encourage people to focus on DA to "understand" their own site's rankings.
  13. expmrb

    DA could not possibly get any worse...

    Still some spammers will tell the others that DA is a metrics that Google uses to rank.:P
  14. They messed up the DA metrics after that link database update. Moz metrics have been pretty wonky ever since and I honestly do think that this will be an improvement.
  15. Mike Friedman

    Local Rankings Drop

    If it is tough to say without really seeing the links if they had a negative impact or not. I know a lot of people like to look at metrics and go to sites that put out some kind of "spam scores" like Moz to determine if a link is good or bad. I generally just use the eye test. I look at the page and site and ask myself, "Would I want my customers/propsects to know I do business with this site and point them to this page?" If I have to think about it, I don't want that link.
  16. Moz: Hold my beer. https://moz.com/blog/new-domain-authority Prepare for the shitfest of "Why did my DA go down?" or "Why did my DA go way up but my traffic didn't improve?"
  17. Robert Broome

    Local Rankings Drop

    Hi everyone, thanks in advance for any help. One of my pages saw a pretty severe rankings drop recently, and it hasn't bounced back. It didn't effect any other page. This was one of my community pages for my local service company. The only thing that changed was I built some links for this page through an outreach service. I've used them in the past with no issues. Is there any real way to tell which link it might be? I checked my webmaster tools and I don't see a penalty.
  18. Robert Broome

    Negative Local SEO - This is real and happening!

    I just checked mine, and added the open date. Thanks for the heads up on this.
  19. This is one of the oddest SEO stories I have read in awhile. https://www.seroundtable.com/bing-increased-url-submission-to-10-000-urls-per-day-27047.html These are the kind of decisions that companies make in a last ditch effort to save money right before they close up shop.
  20. Mike Friedman

    wordpress forced me to gutenberg i think

    It may not have been the database update that did it. You might have automatic updates setup. I cannot stand Gutenberg. I've tried it a couple of times thinking I better learn how to use it. I always just end up throwing my hands up and asking myself why bother? Elementor FTW.
  21. Khemosabi

    wordpress forced me to gutenberg i think

    You should be good to go gnojham. Normally when you first log in to WP, you'll see a notice if any other updates for WP are needed. You can also check the 'updates' in your dashboard, on the left. If you don't want to mess with learning Gutenberg right now, in plugins, just install the classic editor. Check out the ratings of Gutenberg vs classic, you can see how popular Gutenberg ISN'T. LOL.. I've tried it, still hate it, but it does have some pretty cool functions.
  22. i havent paid much attention to wordpress much other than what i see here, but i just logged in to one of my wordpress sites and it forced me to update the database, which i thought would just be the database, but turns out it updated everything or updated it at some other point without me knowing. if my pages mention gutenberg when im editing, then its updated, right?
  23. Terra

    I'm getting published, Baby!

    Thank you Thomas! And, um, you know I love ya right? Then let me just say that you are almost the ugliest woman I've ever seen! LOL! 🤣 Movies? Ha! I think I want a cartoon series. 😀 Terra
  24. Mike Friedman

    I'm getting published, Baby!

    Sorry to hear about your loss. And congrats on all the new developments.
  25. https://advertise.bingads.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/post/january-2019/microsoft-and-verizon-media-strengthen-search-partnership That's going to be a lot of extra volume... Very interesting...
  26. ThomasBelknap

    I'm getting published, Baby!

    Terra, I am sorry to hear about your loss. It is crazy to think how fast things can spiral out of control. Congrats on all of your hard work! As a woman, I am already inspired. I can't wait for the Little Jenna movies.
  27. Terra

    I'm getting published, Baby!

    Hi guys! I hope all is well with you all. This update is going to be bittersweet...I'll share the bitter first. My father-in-law passed away this past Monday. He started in the hospital with double pneumonia, then went to hospice and there, held on for 6 whole days. It was so hard, but he finally succumbed. 😭😭 Secondly, I am excited to share with you the awesome doors of opportunity that have opened up to me. I am co-authoring a book which is an anthology that will be filled with women-only co-authors with courageous stories of bravery, overcoming obstacles, and prevailing over tragedy. This book will serve as a tool to inspire, uplift, and empower women worldwide! Wow! It should be out this coming fall. But that's not all. I am excited to announce that I also accepted an invitation, and am now therefore, on the writing staff at Courageous Woman magazine! Gah! I'm honored and humbled to be asked to be a part of both of the above. And yes, I'll still be writing my series as well. Little Jenna is just getting started. Terra
  1. Load more activity


  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.